This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.
Case Summary
Levin v. Gallery 63 Antiques Corp.
Levin v. Gallery 63 Corp., No. 04-cv-1504 (KMK) (S.D.N.Y., Sept. 26, 2006).
Précis
This breach of warranty case was brought against an art gallery by purchasers who claimed that the gallery had sold them damaged, misattributed, and overpriced items. Ruling on the gallery’s motion for
summary judgment
A judgment granted on a claim or defense about which there is no genuine issue of material fact and upon which the movant is entitled to prevail as a matter of law. The court considers the contents of the pleadings, the motions, and additional evidence adduced by the parties to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact rather than one of law. This procedural device allows the speedy disposition of a controversy without the need for trial (Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004)).
Associated Legal Decision(s)
Associated Statutes and/or Legislation
Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.
