IFAR - International Foundation for Art Research

This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.

Case Summary

Educational Resources > Art Law and Cultural Property > Case Law and Statutes > Other Ownership Title Disputes/Claims Including Conversion and Breach of Contract > Case Summary

Morgold, Inc. v. Keeler

Morgold, Inc. v. Keeler, 891 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995).

Print this Page

Case Summary

Case Details / Image

Précis
In the late 1980s, Andre Lopoukhine, a part owner of a Hudson River School painting, transferred the work to an Arizona businessman in violation of his agreement with his co-owner, Morgold, Inc. The painting was eventually purchased by an art dealer, Fred E. Keeler. Morgold was . . . .

Associated Legal Decision(s)

Morgold, Inc. v. Keeler, 891 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995).

Associated Statutes and/or Legislation

California Statute - Commercial Code § 2103, Definitions and index of definitions

Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.