This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.
Case Summary
John v. Sotheby’s, Inc.
John v. Sotheby’s, Inc., 141 F.R.D. 29 (S.D.N.Y. 1992), granting motion to interplead, but denying motion to dismiss; No. 90-cv-5867 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 11, 1994), denying motion for summary judgment; 858 F. Supp. 1283 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 1994), judgment for plaintiff in part and intervenor in part; 52 F.3d 312 (2d Cir. 1995), aff’g without opinion.
Précis
This case, involving a purported Rembrandt painting, addressed the effects of divorce on a couple’s ownership rights in a painting they had purchased while still married. A federal court in New York ruled that the painting was “marital property,” equally shared by the husband and wife at the time of purchase. When the two divorced, therefore, each retained a 50% interest in the painting and . . . .
Associated Legal Decision(s)
Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.
