This is a brief excerpt from the document you requested from IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Database.

Case Summary

FTC v. Austin

FTC v. Austin Galleries of Illinois, Inc., No. 88-C-3845 (N.D. Ill. 1988) (granting injunction); judgment against Austin (N.D. Ill. 1991); aff'd sub nom. FTC v. Austin, 138 B.R. 898 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1992).

Defendant Donald S. Austin and his corporations sold lithographic prints purported to be by Dali, Chagall, Miro, and Picasso. Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") brought action against Austin and the Austin corporations, alleging that the defendants had falsely represented the prints’ authenticity and value to consumers in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.. . .

Click here to subscribe to IFAR's Art Law & Cultural Property Database to access this and other documents about U.S. and international legislation and case law concerning the acquisition, authenticity, export, ownership, and copyright of art objects.